Fable 2 to ship with no online co-op

I can't think of anything but Mass Effect that would be good in co-op.

The next big RPGish game coming out is Fallout 3.

And that'd be shit in co-op.

I'd maybe play more RPG's if they had co-op, TBH.
Kicking ass with friends is always more fun.

Inofa wrote:

Roosetifer wrote:

Inofa wrote:

Roosetifer wrote:

Adamzzz wrote:

Roosetifer wrote:

Adamzzz wrote:

DarkChaotix wrote:Fuck.

Off.

Microsoft.

"OMFG ONLINE CO-OP. BUT WE'RE NOT GONNA GIVE IT TO YOU STRAIGHT AWAY! BUT WE WON'T TELL YOU THAT FOR A FEW MONTHS, CUS WE'RE FAGGOTS LIKE THAT"

Noice 1 Mr Molyneux, hype the game up to shit, with all your online co-op shit, then not even give it to us straight away.

Noice 1.

Micrsoft? I thought it was whoever made Fable II's fault. =/

Meh, not really bothered. RPG's are always a better single player experience.

Roosetifer, RPGs are signle player experiences and always are better single player.

Yeah your right everyone hates online RPG's, oh wait...

Can you tell me where the fuck I said people hate online RPGs? Oh, right, I didn't. I said RPGs are a better single player experience rather than online.

And I didn't understand your last post. At all.

You said they are always better which is not true tbh, imagine warcraft single player- that would be just god awful. Mass Effect would have been much better in co op instead of having idiots who run infront of you to just get shot at.

And whats there not not understand?

Lost Odyssey co-op? No thank you.
Blue Dragon co-op? No thank you.
Any of the Final Fantasy games with co-op? No thank you.

Only a few RPGs would be good with co-op, Mass Effect being one of them. Other than that, your opinion is shit tbh.

Did i say all rpgs would be better in co op. no i didnt. Most JRPG's would be shit in co op, a lot of WRPG's would be awesome. Notice how you only listed JRPG's.

Notice that there's a huge difference between the amount of decent JRPGs and WRPGs and then think about what you just said.

I still think reguardless of how many WRPG's are good, they could be improved by online co op. Frankly i hate most JRPGs, so really i dont see many as good. Ive had a much better experience with what would be classed as a poor WRPG and what is classed as a good JRPG.

*glad that i didn't pre order*

Roosetifer wrote:

Inofa wrote:

Roosetifer wrote:

Inofa wrote:

Roosetifer wrote:

Adamzzz wrote:

Roosetifer wrote:

Adamzzz wrote:

DarkChaotix wrote:Fuck.

Off.

Microsoft.

"OMFG ONLINE CO-OP. BUT WE'RE NOT GONNA GIVE IT TO YOU STRAIGHT AWAY! BUT WE WON'T TELL YOU THAT FOR A FEW MONTHS, CUS WE'RE FAGGOTS LIKE THAT"

Noice 1 Mr Molyneux, hype the game up to shit, with all your online co-op shit, then not even give it to us straight away.

Noice 1.

Micrsoft? I thought it was whoever made Fable II's fault. =/

Meh, not really bothered. RPG's are always a better single player experience.

Roosetifer, RPGs are signle player experiences and always are better single player.

Yeah your right everyone hates online RPG's, oh wait...

Can you tell me where the fuck I said people hate online RPGs? Oh, right, I didn't. I said RPGs are a better single player experience rather than online.

And I didn't understand your last post. At all.

You said they are always better which is not true tbh, imagine warcraft single player- that would be just god awful. Mass Effect would have been much better in co op instead of having idiots who run infront of you to just get shot at.

And whats there not not understand?

Lost Odyssey co-op? No thank you.
Blue Dragon co-op? No thank you.
Any of the Final Fantasy games with co-op? No thank you.

Only a few RPGs would be good with co-op, Mass Effect being one of them. Other than that, your opinion is shit tbh.

Did i say all rpgs would be better in co op. no i didnt. Most JRPG's would be shit in co op, a lot of WRPG's would be awesome. Notice how you only listed JRPG's.

Notice that there's a huge difference between the amount of decent JRPGs and WRPGs and then think about what you just said.

I still think reguardless of how many WRPG's are good, they could be improved by online co op. Frankly i hate most JRPGs, so really i dont see many as good. Ive had a much better experience with what would be classed as a poor WRPG and what is classed as a good JRPG.

Oblivion and Fallout 3 would be awful with co-op.

Fable 2 is the only WRPG that sounds like it could work with co-op :/

well look at it this way

they're hardly saying theres going to be NO co-op are they

Inofa wrote:

Roosetifer wrote:

Inofa wrote:

Roosetifer wrote:

Inofa wrote:

Roosetifer wrote:

Adamzzz wrote:

Roosetifer wrote:

Adamzzz wrote:

DarkChaotix wrote:Fuck.

Off.

Microsoft.

"OMFG ONLINE CO-OP. BUT WE'RE NOT GONNA GIVE IT TO YOU STRAIGHT AWAY! BUT WE WON'T TELL YOU THAT FOR A FEW MONTHS, CUS WE'RE FAGGOTS LIKE THAT"

Noice 1 Mr Molyneux, hype the game up to shit, with all your online co-op shit, then not even give it to us straight away.

Noice 1.

Micrsoft? I thought it was whoever made Fable II's fault. =/

Meh, not really bothered. RPG's are always a better single player experience.

Roosetifer, RPGs are signle player experiences and always are better single player.

Yeah your right everyone hates online RPG's, oh wait...

Can you tell me where the fuck I said people hate online RPGs? Oh, right, I didn't. I said RPGs are a better single player experience rather than online.

And I didn't understand your last post. At all.

You said they are always better which is not true tbh, imagine warcraft single player- that would be just god awful. Mass Effect would have been much better in co op instead of having idiots who run infront of you to just get shot at.

And whats there not not understand?

Lost Odyssey co-op? No thank you.
Blue Dragon co-op? No thank you.
Any of the Final Fantasy games with co-op? No thank you.

Only a few RPGs would be good with co-op, Mass Effect being one of them. Other than that, your opinion is shit tbh.

Did i say all rpgs would be better in co op. no i didnt. Most JRPG's would be shit in co op, a lot of WRPG's would be awesome. Notice how you only listed JRPG's.

Notice that there's a huge difference between the amount of decent JRPGs and WRPGs and then think about what you just said.

I still think reguardless of how many WRPG's are good, they could be improved by online co op. Frankly i hate most JRPGs, so really i dont see many as good. Ive had a much better experience with what would be classed as a poor WRPG and what is classed as a good JRPG.

Oblivion and Fallout 3 would be awful with co-op.

Fable 2 is the only WRPG that sounds like it could work with co-op :/

Ive always thought Oblivion would be amazing with co op. I know a few people who would agree with me, and we've not played Fallout yet so i dont really know if that would be any good with co op.

Roosetifer wrote:

Inofa wrote:

Roosetifer wrote:

Inofa wrote:

Roosetifer wrote:

Inofa wrote:

Roosetifer wrote:

Adamzzz wrote:

Roosetifer wrote:

Adamzzz wrote:

DarkChaotix wrote:Fuck.

Off.

Microsoft.

"OMFG ONLINE CO-OP. BUT WE'RE NOT GONNA GIVE IT TO YOU STRAIGHT AWAY! BUT WE WON'T TELL YOU THAT FOR A FEW MONTHS, CUS WE'RE FAGGOTS LIKE THAT"

Noice 1 Mr Molyneux, hype the game up to shit, with all your online co-op shit, then not even give it to us straight away.

Noice 1.

Micrsoft? I thought it was whoever made Fable II's fault. =/

Meh, not really bothered. RPG's are always a better single player experience.

Roosetifer, RPGs are signle player experiences and always are better single player.

Yeah your right everyone hates online RPG's, oh wait...

Can you tell me where the fuck I said people hate online RPGs? Oh, right, I didn't. I said RPGs are a better single player experience rather than online.

And I didn't understand your last post. At all.

You said they are always better which is not true tbh, imagine warcraft single player- that would be just god awful. Mass Effect would have been much better in co op instead of having idiots who run infront of you to just get shot at.

And whats there not not understand?

Lost Odyssey co-op? No thank you.
Blue Dragon co-op? No thank you.
Any of the Final Fantasy games with co-op? No thank you.

Only a few RPGs would be good with co-op, Mass Effect being one of them. Other than that, your opinion is shit tbh.

Did i say all rpgs would be better in co op. no i didnt. Most JRPG's would be shit in co op, a lot of WRPG's would be awesome. Notice how you only listed JRPG's.

Notice that there's a huge difference between the amount of decent JRPGs and WRPGs and then think about what you just said.

I still think reguardless of how many WRPG's are good, they could be improved by online co op. Frankly i hate most JRPGs, so really i dont see many as good. Ive had a much better experience with what would be classed as a poor WRPG and what is classed as a good JRPG.

Oblivion and Fallout 3 would be awful with co-op.

Fable 2 is the only WRPG that sounds like it could work with co-op :/

Ive always thought Oblivion would be amazing with co op. I know a few people who would agree with me, and we've not played Fallout yet so i dont really know if that would be any good with co op.

Fallout 3 is basicly Oblivion with guns. So obviously it's going to be similar ¬_¬

I'd probably be spending more time in Single Player anyway so it doesn't bother me that much.

Is it that much of a big deal? Just play it single player. It wont kill you.

Broken_Pixel wrote:Is it that much of a big deal? Just play it single player. It wont kill you.

That's not really the point though. Online co-op is one of the big draws of the game, and is something that people have already preordered it for.

Shortay wrote:

Broken_Pixel wrote:Is it that much of a big deal? Just play it single player. It wont kill you.

That's not really the point though. Online co-op is one of the big draws of the game, and is something that people have already preordered it for,

Just play the single player and develop your character. Online isn't always essential.

Online will be added within a week? Fine by me. I can wait a week to rape all ur wives.

Broken_Pixel wrote:Is it that much of a big deal? Just play it single player. It wont kill you.

If there was an announcement tomorrow saying LBP would ship without the level creator and all you could do for a week was play the campaign, would it be a big deal? Yes.
The co-op in Fable II has been gone on about so much that it is a big deal for us to be told we wont get it straight away. Its not that I didn't expect things like this to happen though, the game has been "finished" so many times. ¬_¬

Sure, I'll still get the game, I planned on playing it through on single player first off anyway. But saying its not a big deal is stupid when blatantly most people here where looking forward to murdering eachothers families... I mean questing and having fun online.

Uchiha Miek wrote:

Broken_Pixel wrote:Is it that much of a big deal? Just play it single player. It wont kill you.

If there was an announcement tomorrow saying LBP would ship without the level creator and all you could do for a week was play the campaign, would it be a big deal? Yes.
The co-op in Fable II has been gone on about so much that it is a big deal for us to be told we wont get it straight away. Its not that I didn't expect things like this to happen though, the game has been "finished" so many times. ¬_¬

Sure, I'll still get the game, I planned on playing it through on single player first off anyway. But saying its not a big deal is stupid when blatantly most people here where looking forward to murdering eachothers families... I mean questing and having fun online.

Judging by the beta, the single player could keep me entertained for more than a week

Uchiha Miek wrote:

Broken_Pixel wrote:Is it that much of a big deal? Just play it single player. It wont kill you.

If there was an announcement tomorrow saying LBP would ship without the level creator and all you could do for a week was play the campaign, would it be a big deal? Yes.
The co-op in Fable II has been gone on about so much that it is a big deal for us to be told we wont get it straight away. Its not that I didn't expect things like this to happen though, the game has been "finished" so many times. ¬_¬

Sure, I'll still get the game, I planned on playing it through on single player first off anyway. But saying its not a big deal is stupid when blatantly most people here where looking forward to murdering eachothers families... I mean questing and having fun online.

Fable is an RPG. An RPG should have at least 30 hours of gameplay, really. I'm pretty sure LBP's campaign won't have as much as that.

And for the bolded part, WHY THE SHIT ARE YOU BOTHERED THEN?

I'm not really... D:
I'm just saying that its quite an annoyance for those who did buy it for co-op in my mind.

Uchiha Miek wrote:I'm not really... D:
I'm just saying that its quite an annoyance for those who did buy it for co-op in my mind.

Well, from your post, you said it'd be a big deal. A deal as big as LBP not having map creator at launch. Then you did a '¬_¬' face to show that you are/were quite annoyed about it.

Not really bothered about it that much though. Fallout 3 and Gears 2 are gonna be WAY better IMO, as well as CoD: WaW and Banjo.

I may get Fable II when I get a 360. I didn't really like Fable though, I thought it was a bit to pretentious for its own good.

Adamzzz wrote:

Uchiha Miek wrote:I'm not really... D:
I'm just saying that its quite an annoyance for those who did buy it for co-op in my mind.

Well, from your post, you said it'd be a big deal. A deal as big as LBP not having map creator at launch. Then you did a '¬_¬' face to show that you are/were quite annoyed about it.

Why are you so bothered that it bothers others?

Adamzzz wrote:

Uchiha Miek wrote:I'm not really... D:
I'm just saying that its quite an annoyance for those who did buy it for co-op in my mind.

Well, from your post, you said it'd be a big deal. A deal as big as LBP not having map creator at launch. Then you did a '¬_¬' face to show that you are/were quite annoyed about it.

Not really bothered about it that much though. Fallout 3 and Gears 2 are gonna be WAY better IMO, as well as CoD: WaW and Banjo.

I was ¬_¬ing the fact that the ammount of times the game has been "finished" is getting stupid.
It is a big deal for some, just not for me. xD

CYBERFROST wrote:

Adamzzz wrote:

Uchiha Miek wrote:I'm not really... D:
I'm just saying that its quite an annoyance for those who did buy it for co-op in my mind.

Well, from your post, you said it'd be a big deal. A deal as big as LBP not having map creator at launch. Then you did a '¬_¬' face to show that you are/were quite annoyed about it.

Why are you so bothered that it bothers others?

Because it bothers me when people get bothered about something so little that will be fixed within 7 days. When Halo 3 came out, everyone didn't do co-op on their first playthrough. I reckon alot of people won't do a full playthrough co-op before they do it single player.

Adamzzz wrote:

CYBERFROST wrote:

Adamzzz wrote:

Uchiha Miek wrote:I'm not really... D:
I'm just saying that its quite an annoyance for those who did buy it for co-op in my mind.

Well, from your post, you said it'd be a big deal. A deal as big as LBP not having map creator at launch. Then you did a '¬_¬' face to show that you are/were quite annoyed about it.

Why are you so bothered that it bothers others?

Because it bothers me when people get bothered about something so little that will be fixed within 7 days. When Halo 3 came out, everyone didn't do co-op on their first playthrough. I reckon alot of people won't do a full playthrough co-op before they do it single player.

Well, tbf, they're HOPING it will be fixed within the week of release. It could take longer. (Kinda like how The Behemoth are hard at work on the Castle Crashers patch. )

Wink indeed. ._.

Well thats a bitch...

I'll buy it anyway but lack of co-op from the start is disgraceful after the main hype of the game was its online capabilities.